lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ad60d5d2-cfdf-df9f-aef1-7a0d3facbece@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 2 May 2023 15:47:43 +0200 From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com> To: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com> Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@...nelisnetworks.com>, Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>, Nelson Escobar <neescoba@...co.com>, Bernard Metzler <bmt@...ich.ibm.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Bjorn Topel <bjorn@...nel.org>, Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>, Jonathan Lemon <jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Jesper Dangaard Brouer <hawk@...nel.org>, John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>, Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, Mika Penttila <mpenttil@...hat.com>, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>, Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>, Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] mm/gup: disallow FOLL_LONGTERM GUP-fast writing to file-backed mappings On 02.05.23 15:43, Matthew Rosato wrote: > On 5/2/23 9:39 AM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >> On 02.05.23 15:36, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:28:40PM +0200, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>>> On 02.05.23 15:10, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: >>>>> On Tue, May 02, 2023 at 03:04:27PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>>> \> > We can reintroduce a flag to permit exceptions if this is really broken, are you >>>>>>> able to test? I don't have an s390 sat around :) >>>>>> >>>>>> Matt (Rosato on cc) probably can. In the end, it would mean having >>>>>> <memoryBacking> >>>>>> <source type="file"/> >>>>>> </memoryBacking> >>>>> >>>>> This s390 code is the least of the problems, after this series VFIO >>>>> won't startup at all with this configuration. >>>> >>>> Good question if the domain would fail to start. I recall that IOMMUs for >>>> zPCI are special on s390x. [1] >>> >>> Not upstream they aren't. >>> >>>> Well, zPCI is special. I cannot immediately tell when we would trigger >>>> long-term pinning. >>> >>> zPCI uses the standard IOMMU stuff, so it uses a normal VFIO container >>> and the normal pin_user_pages() path. >> >> >> @Christian, Matthew: would we pin all guest memory when starting the domain (IIRC, like on x86-64) and fail early, or only when the guest issues rpcit instructions to map individual pages? >> > > Eventually we want to implement a mechanism where we can dynamically pin in response to RPCIT. > Okay, so IIRC we'll fail starting the domain early, that's good. And if we pin all guest memory (instead of small pieces dynamically), there is little existing use for file-backed RAM in such zPCI configurations (because memory cannot be reclaimed either way if it's all pinned), so likely there are no real existing users. > However, per Jason's prior suggestion, the initial implementation for s390 nesting via iommufd will pin all of guest memory when starting the domain. I have something already working via iommufd built on top of the nesting infrastructure patches and QEMU iommufd series that are floating around; needs some cleanup, hoping to send an RFC in the coming weeks. I can CC you if you'd like. Yes, please. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists