[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f5518a73-ebba-32a1-3c70-464c6d233760@datenfreihafen.org>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 14:01:58 +0200
From: Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>
Cc: "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ca8210: move to gpio descriptors
Hello Arnd.
On 26.01.23 17:25, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2023, at 17:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>> if (ret) {
>> - dev_crit(&spi->dev, "request_irq %d failed\n", pdata->irq_id);
>> - gpiod_unexport(gpio_to_desc(pdata->gpio_irq));
>> - gpio_free(pdata->gpio_irq);
>> + dev_crit(&spi->dev, "request_irq %d failed\n", priv->irq_id);
>> + gpiod_put(priv->gpio_irq);
>> }
>
> I just realized that this bit depends on the "gpiolib: remove
> legacy gpio_export" patch I sent to the gpio mailing list earlier.
>
> We can probably just defer this change until that is merged,
> or alternatively I can rebase this patch to avoid the
> dependency.
I think the gpiolib ependency should be merged now. Do you want to
rebase this patch against latest? We had some other ca8210 changes
coming in.
regards
Stefan Schmidt
Powered by blists - more mailing lists