[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230503200545.2ff5d9d2@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 3 May 2023 20:05:45 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Maxim Georgiev <glipus@...il.com>
Cc: kory.maincent@...tlin.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev, richardcochran@...il.com,
gerhard@...leder-embedded.com, liuhangbin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next v6 2/5] net: Add ifreq pointer field to
kernel_hwtstamp_config structure
On Mon, 1 May 2023 22:31:47 -0600 Maxim Georgiev wrote:
> + err = dev_eth_ioctl(dev, &ifrr, SIOCSHWTSTAMP);
> + if (!err) {
> + kernel_cfg->ifr->ifr_ifru = ifrr.ifr_ifru;
> + kernel_cfg->kernel_flags |= KERNEL_HWTSTAMP_FLAG_IFR_RESULT;
> + }
> + return err;
nit: I think we should stick to the normal flow even if it costs
a few extra lines:
err = dev_eth_ioctl(..
if (err)
return err;
kernel_cfg->ifr->ifr_ifru = ifrr.ifr_ifru;
kernel_cfg->kernel_flags |= KERNEL_HWTSTAMP_FLAG_IFR_RESULT;
return 0;
Other than that patches LGTM :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists