[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87mt2kqkke.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 16:40:21 +0300
From: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: Ivan Vecera <ivecera@...hat.com>, Simon Horman
<simon.horman@...igine.com>, Pedro Tammela <pctammela@...atatu.com>,
<davem@...emloft.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <jhs@...atatu.com>,
<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, <jiri@...nulli.us>, <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
<paulb@...dia.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/2] net/sched: flower: fix error handler on replace
On Tue 02 May 2023 at 19:44, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2023 14:03:19 +0300 Vlad Buslov wrote:
>> Note that with these changes (both accepted patch and preceding diff)
>> you are exposing filter to dapapath access (datapath looks up filter via
>> hash table, not idr) with its handle set to 0 initially and then resent
>> while already accessible. After taking a quick look at Paul's
>> miss-to-action code it seems that handle value used by datapath is taken
>> from struct tcf_exts_miss_cookie_node not from filter directly, so such
>> approach likely doesn't break anything existing, but I might have missed
>> something.
>
> Did we deadlock in this discussion, or the issue was otherwise fixed?
>From my side I explained why in my opinion Ivan's fix doesn't cover all
cases and my approach is better overall. Don't know what else to discuss
since it seems that everyone agreed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists