netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Refactor target specific pinctrl driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 12:26:58 +0530
From: Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>, <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
        <linus.walleij@...aro.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        <manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/3] pinctrl: qcom: Refactor target specific pinctrl
 driver


On 5/3/2023 7:23 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 2:14 PM Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com> wrote:
>> On 5/3/2023 3:11 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 3, 2023 at 8:39 AM Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@...cinc.com> wrote:
> ...
>
>>>>    /**
>>>>     * struct msm_function - a pinmux function
>>>> - * @name:    Name of the pinmux function.
>>>> - * @groups:  List of pingroups for this function.
>>>> - * @ngroups: Number of entries in @groups.
>>>> + * @func: Generic data of the pin function (name and groups of pins)
>>>>     */
>>>>    struct msm_function {
>>>> -       const char *name;
>>>> -       const char * const *groups;
>>>> -       unsigned ngroups;
>>>> +       struct pinfunction func;
>>>>    };
>>> But why? Just kill the entire structure.
>> Got it. Can we have a typedef for pinfunction to msm_function in the msm
>> header file?
> But why? You can replace the type everywhere it needs to be replaced.
> I can't expect many lines to change.
>
> Also consider splitting struct pingroup change out of this. We will
> focus only on the struct pinfunction change and less code to review.
Ok Will update all of this.

Thanks,
Rohit.