netdev - Re: [PATCH 07/11] leds: trigger: netdev: reject interval and device store for hw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZFjdpncRYi2N0gGQ@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2023 13:31:50 +0200
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
To: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
	Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] leds: trigger: netdev: reject interval and device
 store for hw_control

Hi Christian,

On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 02:15:37AM +0200, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Reject interval and device store with hw_control enabled. They are
> currently not supported and MUST be empty with hw_control enabled.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
> index 28c4465a2584..8cd876647a27 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-netdev.c
> @@ -248,6 +255,13 @@ static ssize_t interval_store(struct device *dev,
>  	unsigned long value;
>  	int ret;
>  
> +	mutex_lock(&trigger_data->lock);
> +
> +	if (trigger_data->hw_control) {
> +		size = -EINVAL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
>  	ret = kstrtoul(buf, 0, &value);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return ret;

You return with the mutex held here. You could do the kstrtoul() before
acquiring the mutex.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |