[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <342380d989ce26bc49f0e5d45fbb0416a5f7809f.1683606193.git.lukas@wunner.de>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 06:28:56 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>, Zhi Han <hanzhi09@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: enc28j60: Use threaded interrupt instead of
workqueue
From: Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>
The Microchip ENC28J60 SPI Ethernet driver schedules a work item from
the interrupt handler because accesses to the SPI bus may sleep.
On PREEMPT_RT (which forces interrupt handling into threads) this
old-fashioned approach unnecessarily increases latency because an
interrupt results in first waking the interrupt thread, then scheduling
the work item. So, a double indirection to handle an interrupt.
Avoid by converting the driver to modern threaded interrupt handling.
Signed-off-by: Philipp Rosenberger <p.rosenberger@...bus.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhi Han <hanzhi09@...il.com>
[lukas: rewrite commit message, linewrap request_threaded_irq() call]
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/enc28j60.c | 28 +++++------------------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/enc28j60.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/enc28j60.c
index 176efbeae127..d6c9491537e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/enc28j60.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/microchip/enc28j60.c
@@ -58,7 +58,6 @@ struct enc28j60_net {
struct mutex lock;
struct sk_buff *tx_skb;
struct work_struct tx_work;
- struct work_struct irq_work;
struct work_struct setrx_work;
struct work_struct restart_work;
u8 bank; /* current register bank selected */
@@ -1118,10 +1117,9 @@ static int enc28j60_rx_interrupt(struct net_device *ndev)
return ret;
}
-static void enc28j60_irq_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
+static irqreturn_t enc28j60_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
{
- struct enc28j60_net *priv =
- container_of(work, struct enc28j60_net, irq_work);
+ struct enc28j60_net *priv = dev_id;
struct net_device *ndev = priv->netdev;
int intflags, loop;
@@ -1225,6 +1223,8 @@ static void enc28j60_irq_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
/* re-enable interrupts */
locked_reg_bfset(priv, EIE, EIE_INTIE);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
/*
@@ -1309,22 +1309,6 @@ static void enc28j60_tx_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
enc28j60_hw_tx(priv);
}
-static irqreturn_t enc28j60_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
-{
- struct enc28j60_net *priv = dev_id;
-
- /*
- * Can't do anything in interrupt context because we need to
- * block (spi_sync() is blocking) so fire of the interrupt
- * handling workqueue.
- * Remember that we access enc28j60 registers through SPI bus
- * via spi_sync() call.
- */
- schedule_work(&priv->irq_work);
-
- return IRQ_HANDLED;
-}
-
static void enc28j60_tx_timeout(struct net_device *ndev, unsigned int txqueue)
{
struct enc28j60_net *priv = netdev_priv(ndev);
@@ -1559,7 +1543,6 @@ static int enc28j60_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
mutex_init(&priv->lock);
INIT_WORK(&priv->tx_work, enc28j60_tx_work_handler);
INIT_WORK(&priv->setrx_work, enc28j60_setrx_work_handler);
- INIT_WORK(&priv->irq_work, enc28j60_irq_work_handler);
INIT_WORK(&priv->restart_work, enc28j60_restart_work_handler);
spi_set_drvdata(spi, priv); /* spi to priv reference */
SET_NETDEV_DEV(dev, &spi->dev);
@@ -1578,7 +1561,8 @@ static int enc28j60_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
/* Board setup must set the relevant edge trigger type;
* level triggers won't currently work.
*/
- ret = request_irq(spi->irq, enc28j60_irq, 0, DRV_NAME, priv);
+ ret = request_threaded_irq(spi->irq, NULL, enc28j60_irq, IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ DRV_NAME, priv);
if (ret < 0) {
if (netif_msg_probe(priv))
dev_err(&spi->dev, "request irq %d failed (ret = %d)\n",
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists