netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-visconti: Make visconti_eth_clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYWPR01MB9420B21A11C1586EDCF9270892769@TYWPR01MB9420.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 9 May 2023 01:33:39 +0000
From: <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
To: <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
        <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <kuba@...nel.org>,
        <pabeni@...hat.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kernel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-visconti: Make
 visconti_eth_clock_remove() return void

Hi Uwe,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Sent: Monday, May 8, 2023 11:26 PM
> To: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>; Alexandre Torgue
> <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>; Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>;
> David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni
> <pabeni@...hat.com>; Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>;
> iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○ＤＩＴＣ□ＤＩＴ○ＯＳＴ)
> <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com;
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org; kernel@...gutronix.de
> Subject: [PATCH net-next v2 02/11] net: stmmac: dwmac-visconti: Make
> visconti_eth_clock_remove() return void
> 
> The function returns zero unconditionally. Change it to return void instead
> which simplifies one caller as error handing becomes unnecessary.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>

Best regards,
 Nobuhiro