[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <472D6877-F434-4537-A075-FE1AE0ED078A@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 11 May 2023 16:04:29 +0000
From: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"edumazet@...gle.com"
<edumazet@...gle.com>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"zbr@...emap.net" <zbr@...emap.net>,
"brauner@...nel.org"
<brauner@...nel.org>,
"johannes@...solutions.net"
<johannes@...solutions.net>,
"ecree.xilinx@...il.com"
<ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
"keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
"socketcan@...tkopp.net"
<socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
"petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering
> On Apr 27, 2023, at 10:03 AM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:58:55 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>> Jakub, could you please look into reviewing patches 3,4 & 5 as well?
>> Patch 4 is just test code. Patch 3 is fixing bug fixes in current
>> code so should be good to have - also it is not too connector
>> specific. I can explain patch 5 in more detail if needed.
>
> I don't have sufficient knowledge to review that code, sorry :(
Is there anyone who can please help review this code?
Christian, could you please help take a look?
Thanks
Anjali
Powered by blists - more mailing lists