netdev - Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BF7B6B37-10BF-41C0-BA77-F34C31ED886E@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 16:15:31 +0000
From: Anjali Kulkarni <anjali.k.kulkarni@...cle.com>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        "edumazet@...gle.com"
	<edumazet@...gle.com>,
        "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        "zbr@...emap.net" <zbr@...emap.net>,
        "brauner@...nel.org"
	<brauner@...nel.org>,
        "johannes@...solutions.net"
	<johannes@...solutions.net>,
        "ecree.xilinx@...il.com"
	<ecree.xilinx@...il.com>,
        "leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "socketcan@...tkopp.net"
	<socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        "petrm@...dia.com" <petrm@...dia.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] netlink: Reverse the patch which removed filtering



> On May 11, 2023, at 9:04 AM, Anjali Kulkarni <Anjali.K.Kulkarni@...cle.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Apr 27, 2023, at 10:03 AM, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Wed, 26 Apr 2023 23:58:55 +0000 Anjali Kulkarni wrote:
>>> Jakub, could you please look into reviewing patches 3,4 & 5 as well?
>>> Patch 4 is just test code. Patch 3 is fixing bug fixes in current
>>> code so should be good to have - also it is not too connector
>>> specific. I can explain patch 5 in more detail if needed.
>> 
>> I don't have sufficient knowledge to review that code, sorry :(
> 
> Is there anyone who can please help review this code? 
> Christian, could you please help take a look?
> Thanks
> Anjali
> 

Gentle ping again - Christian could you please help review?
Anjali