[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f1b8d851-1e01-4719-aa2e-4b628838a515@lunn.ch>
Date: Sat, 13 May 2023 19:47:35 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next 7/9] net: pcs: xpcs: correct pause resolution
On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 06:27:35PM +0100, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> xpcs was indicating symmetric pause should be enabled regardless of
> the advertisements by either party. Fix this to use
> linkmode_resolve_pause() now that we're no longer obliterating the
> link partner's advertisement by logically anding it with our own.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> ---
> drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> index 43115d04c01a..beed799a69a7 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/pcs/pcs-xpcs.c
> @@ -538,11 +538,20 @@ static void xpcs_resolve_lpa_c73(struct dw_xpcs *xpcs,
> struct phylink_link_state *state)
> {
> __ETHTOOL_DECLARE_LINK_MODE_MASK(res);
> + bool tx_pause, rx_pause;
>
> /* Calculate the union of the advertising masks */
> linkmode_and(res, state->lp_advertising, state->advertising);
>
> - state->pause = MLO_PAUSE_TX | MLO_PAUSE_RX;
> + /* Resolve pause modes */
> + linkmode_resolve_pause(state->advertising, state->lp_advertising,
> + &tx_pause, &rx_pause);
> +
> + if (tx_pause)
> + state->pause |= MLO_PAUSE_TX;
> + if (rx_pause)
> + state->pause |= MLO_PAUSE_RX;
> +
Hi Russell
I must be missing something. Why not use phylink_resolve_an_pause()?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists