[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230515091226.sd2sidyjll64jjay@soft-dev3-1>
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 11:12:26 +0200
From: Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
To: <edumazet@...gle.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Performance regression on lan966x when extracting frames
Hi,
I have noticed that on the HEAD of net-next[0] there is a performance drop
for lan966x when extracting frames towards the CPU. Lan966x has a Cortex
A7 CPU. All the tests are done using iperf3 command like this:
'iperf3 -c 10.97.10.1 -R'
So on net-next, I can see the following:
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 473 MBytes 396 Mbits/sec 456 sender
And it gets around ~97000 interrupts.
While going back to the commit[1], I can see the following:
[ 5] 0.00-10.02 sec 632 MBytes 529 Mbits/sec 11 sender
And it gets around ~1000 interrupts.
I have done a little bit of searching and I have noticed that this
commit [2] introduce the regression.
I have tried to revert this commit on net-next and tried again, then I
can see much better results but not exactly the same:
[ 5] 0.00-10.01 sec 616 MBytes 516 Mbits/sec 0 sender
And it gets around ~700 interrupts.
So my question is, was I supposed to change something in lan966x driver?
or is there a bug in lan966x driver that pop up because of this change?
Any advice will be great. Thanks!
[0] befcc1fce564 ("sfc: fix use-after-free in efx_tc_flower_record_encap_match()")
[1] d4671cb96fa3 ("Merge branch 'lan966x-tx-rx-improve'")
[2] 8b43fd3d1d7d ("net: optimize ____napi_schedule() to avoid extra NET_RX_SOFTIRQ")
--
/Horatiu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists