[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZGpcGbq47nL/rlEb@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 21 May 2023 18:59:53 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: David Epping <david.epping@...singlinkelectronics.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/3] net: phy: mscc: enable VSC8501/2 RGMII RX clock
On Sat, May 20, 2023 at 06:06:03PM +0200, David Epping wrote:
> +static int vsc85xx_rgmii_enable_rx_clk(struct phy_device *phydev,
> + u32 rgmii_cntl)
> +{
> + int rc, phy_id;
> +
> + phy_id = phydev->drv->phy_id & phydev->drv->phy_id_mask;
> + if (PHY_ID_VSC8501 != phy_id && PHY_ID_VSC8502 != phy_id)
> + return 0;
As you are accessing the phy_id in the phy_driver struct, isn't it
already true that this will be initialised to constants such as
PHY_ID_VSC8501 or PHY_ID_VSC8502? In which case, why would you need
to mask it with drv->phy_id_mask ?
> +
> + mutex_lock(&phydev->lock);
> +
> + rc = phy_modify_paged(phydev, MSCC_PHY_PAGE_EXTENDED_2, rgmii_cntl,
> + VSC8502_RGMII_RX_CLK_DISABLE, 0);
> +
> + mutex_unlock(&phydev->lock);
What is the purpose of taking this lock? phy_modify_paged() will do its
read-modify-write access and page accesses under the MDIO bus lock,
which should be all that's required to guarantee an atomic update.
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists