lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <5feba864-b792-4fe4-a58a-e1b22bb7842b@lunn.ch> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:25:38 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: arinc9.unal@...il.com Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Landen Chao <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>, Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>, Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>, Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com, mithat.guner@...ont.com, Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU & LLDP, and prefer CPU port On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:02PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote: > Hello! > > This patch series simplifies the code, improves the logic of the switch > hardware support, traps LLDP frames and BPDUs for MT7530, MT7531, and > MT7988 SoC switches, and introduces the preferring local CPU port > operation. Hi Arınç https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html says: Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes longer to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they find a large chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a short time, so Maintainers just do it. As a result, a sequence of smaller series gets merged quicker and with better review coverage. Given you description above, it sounds like this could easily be split into smaller patch series. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists