netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU & LLDP, and prefer CPU port

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 16:37:28 +0300
From: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Sean Wang <sean.wang@...iatek.com>, Landen Chao
 <Landen.Chao@...iatek.com>, DENG Qingfang <dqfext@...il.com>,
 Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>, Florian Fainelli
 <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
 "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
 Richard van Schagen <richard@...terhints.com>,
 Richard van Schagen <vschagen@...com>,
 Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>,
 Bartel Eerdekens <bartel.eerdekens@...stell8.be>, erkin.bozoglu@...ont.com,
 mithat.guner@...ont.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/30] net: dsa: mt7530: improve, trap BPDU &
 LLDP, and prefer CPU port

On 22.05.2023 15:25, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 03:15:02PM +0300, arinc9.unal@...il.com wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> This patch series simplifies the code, improves the logic of the switch
>> hardware support, traps LLDP frames and BPDUs for MT7530, MT7531, and
>> MT7988 SoC switches, and introduces the preferring local CPU port
>> operation.
> 
> Hi Arınç
> 
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> 
> says:
> 
>    Avoid sending series longer than 15 patches. Larger series takes
>    longer to review as reviewers will defer looking at it until they
>    find a large chunk of time. A small series can be reviewed in a
>    short time, so Maintainers just do it. As a result, a sequence of
>    smaller series gets merged quicker and with better review coverage.
> 
> Given you description above, it sounds like this could easily be split
> into smaller patch series.

Later patches require the prior ones to apply properly. I can submit the
first 15 patches, then the remaining once the first submission is applied.
Would that suit you?

Arınç