lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <f417ba86-4d48-44e9-8bf0-aa15c466a9f2@lunn.ch> Date: Mon, 22 May 2023 14:38:39 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> To: Parthiban Veerasooran <Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com> Cc: hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se, horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com, Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 3/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: update LAN867x PHY supported revision number > -#define PHY_ID_LAN867X 0x0007C160 > +#define PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1 0x0007C162 > static struct phy_driver microchip_t1s_driver[] = { > { > - PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_LAN867X), > - .name = "LAN867X", > + PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1), > + .name = "LAN867X Rev.B1", > .features = PHY_BASIC_T1S_P2MP_FEATURES, > - .config_init = lan867x_config_init, > + .config_init = lan867x_revb1_config_init, > .read_status = lan867x_read_status, > .get_plca_cfg = genphy_c45_plca_get_cfg, > .set_plca_cfg = genphy_c45_plca_set_cfg, > @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static struct phy_driver microchip_t1s_driver[] = { > module_phy_driver(microchip_t1s_driver); > > static struct mdio_device_id __maybe_unused tbl[] = { > - { PHY_ID_MATCH_MODEL(PHY_ID_LAN867X) }, > + { PHY_ID_MATCH_EXACT(PHY_ID_LAN867X_REVB1) }, > { } > }; Maybe i asked this last time... What versions actually exist? The old entry would match 0x0007C16X, so 0x0007C160 and 0x0007C161, 0x0007C162, if those actually exist. Now you are narrowing it down to just 0x0007C162. It would be good to comment on this in the commit message, that 0x0007C160 and 0x0007C161 never escaped the testing facility and hence don't need to be supported. Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists