netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: pass directly chip structure to mv88e6xxx_phy_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a7fac7b-e04b-27e2-8679-ffbbb23c248e@bootlin.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 16:46:35 +0200
From: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
 Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>, "David S. Miller"
 <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
 Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>, Rob Herring
 <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
 <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
 devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
 paul.arola@...us.com, scott.roberts@...us.com, Marek Behún
 <kabel@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/7] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: pass directly chip
 structure to mv88e6xxx_phy_is_internal

Hello Russell,

On 5/24/23 15:18, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 03:01:22PM +0200, Alexis Lothoré wrote:
>> Since this function is a simple helper, we do not need to pass a full
>> dsa_switch structure, we can directly pass the mv88e6xxx_chip structure.
>> Doing so will allow to share this function with any other function
>> not manipulating dsa_switch structure but needing info about number of
>> internal phys
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
>> Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
>>
>> ---
>> Changes since v2:
>> - add reviewed-by tags
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexis Lothoré <alexis.lothore@...tlin.com>
>> ---
> 
> It never ceases to amaze me the way human beings can find creative ways
> to mess things up, no matter how well things are documented. The above
> commit message (and the others that I've looked at) are all broken
> because of this creativity.
> 
> In effect, because of the really weird format you've come up with here,
> your patches are in effect *not* signed off by you.

Sorry for that. This was an attempt to provide relevant changelog for each
patch, but obviously the way I stored those changelogs was wrong, and I did not
catch the consequent broken Signed-off-by lines after re-generating the series.
I'll do as suggested and hold off a bit before fixing/re-sending.

Kind regards,
> 
> The patch format is in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> under the section marked "The canonical patch format". Please review.
> 
> Please wait a while (a few days) to see if anyone responds to _this_
> posting with any other comments. Thanks.
> 

-- 
Alexis Lothoré, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com