[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8302be1b-416a-de32-c43b-73bd378f8122@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 13:08:19 +0200
From: Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
To: David Christensen <drc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni
<pabeni@...hat.com>, Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>,
Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@...el.com>, Michal Kubiak
<michal.kubiak@...el.com>, Larysa Zaremba <larysa.zaremba@...el.com>, "Jesper
Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@...nel.org>, Ilias Apalodimas
<ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 08/11] iavf: switch to Page Pool
From: David Christensen <drc@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2023 15:42:28 -0700
>
>
> On 5/16/23 9:18 AM, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
>> Now that the IAVF driver simply uses dev_alloc_page() + free_page() with
>> no custom recycling logics and one whole page per frame, it can easily
>> be switched to using Page Pool API instead.
>
> Any plans to add page pool fragmentation support (i.e.
> PP_FLAG_PAGE_FRAG) in the future to better support architectures with
> larger page sizes such as 64KB on ppc64le?
Currently no, we resigned from page fragmentation due to the complexity
and restrictions it provides for no benefits on x86_64. But I remember
that pages > 4 Kb exist (I have a couple MIPS boards where I have fun
sometimes and page size is set to 16 Kb there. But still always use 1
page per frame).
By "better support" you mean reducing memory usage or something else?
>
> Dave
Thanks,
Olek
Powered by blists - more mailing lists