[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG9CajddFYKAFlO/@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 12:11:38 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexis.lothore@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: mdio: Introduce a regmap-based mdio
driver
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> +struct mii_bus *devm_mdio_regmap_register(struct device *dev,
> + const struct mdio_regmap_config *config)
> +{
> + struct mdio_regmap_config *mrc;
> + struct mii_bus *mii;
> + int rc;
> +
> + if (!config->parent)
> + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> + mii = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(config->parent, sizeof(*mrc));
> + if (!mii)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> +
> + mrc = mii->priv;
> + memcpy(mrc, config, sizeof(*mrc));
> +
> + mrc->regmap = config->regmap;
> + mrc->valid_addr = config->valid_addr;
You have just memcpy'd everything from config into mrc. Doesn't this
already include "regmap" and "valid_addr" ?
However, these are the only two things used, so does it really make
sense to allocate the full mdio_regmap_config structure, or would a
smaller data structure (of one pointer and one u8) be more appropriate?
--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists