[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230525144122.3d2d8aba@pc-7.home>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 14:41:22 +0200
From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alexis.lothore@...tlin.com, thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com, Andrew Lunn
<andrew@...n.ch>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Eric Dumazet
<edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Florian Fainelli
<f.fainelli@...il.com>, Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>, Vladimir
Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Maxime Coquelin
<mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Alexandre
Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Giuseppe Cavallaro
<peppe.cavallaro@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 1/4] net: mdio: Introduce a regmap-based
mdio driver
Hello Russell,
On Thu, 25 May 2023 12:11:38 +0100
"Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 12:11:23PM +0200, Maxime Chevallier wrote:
> > +struct mii_bus *devm_mdio_regmap_register(struct device *dev,
> > + const struct
> > mdio_regmap_config *config) +{
> > + struct mdio_regmap_config *mrc;
> > + struct mii_bus *mii;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (!config->parent)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > + mii = devm_mdiobus_alloc_size(config->parent,
> > sizeof(*mrc));
> > + if (!mii)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> > +
> > + mrc = mii->priv;
> > + memcpy(mrc, config, sizeof(*mrc));
> > +
> > + mrc->regmap = config->regmap;
> > + mrc->valid_addr = config->valid_addr;
>
> You have just memcpy'd everything from config into mrc. Doesn't this
> already include "regmap" and "valid_addr" ?
Oh right... good catch, thanks !
> However, these are the only two things used, so does it really make
> sense to allocate the full mdio_regmap_config structure, or would a
> smaller data structure (of one pointer and one u8) be more
> appropriate?
>
You are correct, other fields are unused so I'll use a new struct for
the mii->priv field.
Thank you for reviewing,
Best regards,
Maxime
Powered by blists - more mailing lists