netdev - RE: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded static string length

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <81d01562a59a4fb49cd4681ebcf2e74a@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 15:04:33 +0000
From: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To: 'Kenny Ho' <y2kenny@...il.com>
CC: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
	Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>, "David S.
 Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, "Jakub
 Kicinski" <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded static string length

From: Kenny Ho
> Sent: 25 May 2023 15:28
> To: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>; Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>;
> David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>; linux-
> afs@...ts.infradead.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded static string length
> 
> On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 5:14 AM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> >
> > I does rather beg the question as what is in UTS_RELEASE when
> > it exceeds (IIRC) about 48 characters?
> 
> Thanks for the question as it made me dig deeper.  UTS_RELEASE is
> actually capped at 64:
...

But isn't UTS_RELEASE usually much shorter?
I think it is what 'uname -r' prints, the longest I've seen recently
is "3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64" - well under the limit.

...
> 
> "The standard formulation seems to be: <project> <version> built
> <yyyy>-<mm>-<dd>"

Which I don't recall the string actually matching?
Also the people who like reproducible builds don't like __DATE__.

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)