[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOWid-d=OFn7JS5JvsK9qc7X6HeZgOm5OAd1_g2=_GZgpKRZnA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 11:37:54 -0400
From: Kenny Ho <y2kenny@...il.com>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
Kenny Ho <Kenny.Ho@....com>, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove hardcoded static string length
On Thu, May 25, 2023 at 11:04 AM David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com> wrote:
> But isn't UTS_RELEASE usually much shorter?
> I think it is what 'uname -r' prints, the longest I've seen recently
> is "3.10.0-1127.19.1.el7.x86_64" - well under the limit.
Usually yes, but I believe LOCALVERSION can be appended to
KERNELRELEASE / UTS_RELEASE which can makes it much longer.
> > "The standard formulation seems to be: <project> <version> built
> > <yyyy>-<mm>-<dd>"
>
> Which I don't recall the string actually matching?
> Also the people who like reproducible builds don't like __DATE__.
That's correct, it was not matching even when it was introduced. I am
simply taking that as people caring about the content and not simply
making rxrpc_version_string == UTS_RELEASE. The current format is:
"linux-" UTS_RELEASE " AF_RXRPC"
Kenny
Powered by blists - more mailing lists