[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZG+SlRD9aBBkuCsv@nanopsycho>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2023 18:53:41 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, leon@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com,
moshe@...dia.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, tariqt@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com,
petrm@...dia.com, simon.horman@...igine.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com,
habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, michal.wilczynski@...el.com,
jacob.e.keller@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch net-next 05/15] devlink: move port_split/unsplit() ops
into devlink_port_ops
Thu, May 25, 2023 at 05:27:03PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Thu, 25 May 2023 08:05:22 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> >I think it's because every time I look at struct net_device_ops
>> >a little part of me gives up.
>>
>> Does this work? I checked the existing layout of devlink_ops and the
>> internal comments are ignored by kdoc. Actually the whole devlink_ops
>> struct is omitted in kdoc. See:
>> $ scripts/kernel-doc include/net/devlink.h
>
>Hm, it should work, it's documented as a legal way to kdoc:
>
>https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/doc-guide/kernel-doc.html#in-line-member-documentation-comments
>
>We should ask Jon if you're sure it's broken.
IDK, you can try, I don't see it there.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists