lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <ZHBzk9qVqM4lq2Jf@nanopsycho> Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 10:53:39 +0200 From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, pabeni@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, leon@...nel.org, saeedm@...dia.com, moshe@...dia.com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, tariqt@...dia.com, idosch@...dia.com, petrm@...dia.com, simon.horman@...igine.com, ecree.xilinx@...il.com, habetsm.xilinx@...il.com, michal.wilczynski@...el.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com Subject: Re: [patch net-next 15/15] devlink: save devlink_port_ops into a variable in devlink_port_function_validate() Thu, May 25, 2023 at 05:29:33PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote: >On Thu, 25 May 2023 07:58:09 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote: >> >I was kinda expected last patch will remove the !ops checks. >> >Another series comes after this to convert more drivers? >> >> Well, there are still drivers that don't use the port at all ops. I can >> have them register with empty struct if you like, no strong opinition. I >> can do that as follow-up (this set has 15 patches already anyway). Let >> me know. > >Hm. Or maybe we can hook in an empty ops struct in the core when driver >passes NULL? No strong preference. Okay, will check, thx!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists