netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: replace read-modify-write code with phy_modify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZHC78yzOp/xIXKYL@builder>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 16:02:27 +0200
From: Ramón Nordin Rodriguez <ramon.nordin.rodriguez@...roamp.se>
To: Parthiban.Veerasooran@...rochip.com
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, hkallweit1@...il.com, linux@...linux.org.uk,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Horatiu.Vultur@...rochip.com,
	Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com, Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com,
	Thorsten.Kummermehr@...rochip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 2/6] net: phy: microchip_t1s: replace
 read-modify-write code with phy_modify_mmd

> >> /* Reference to AN1699
> >>    *
> >> https://ww1.microchip.com/downloads/aemDocuments/documents/AIS/ProductDocuments/SupportingCollateral/AN-LAN8670-1-2-config-60001699.pdf
> >>    * AN1699 says Read, Modify, Write, but the Write is not required if
> >> the  register already has the required value. So it is safe to use
> >> phy_modify_mmd here.
> >>    */
> >>
> >> So in future, if someone wants to know about this configuration they can
> >> simply refer the AN1699.
> >>
> >> What do you think?
> >>
> > 
> > I'm not sure about the link, resources have a tendency to move.
> Yes, I agree with you but somehow there is no way for giving the 
> reference to this document. May be we will keep this link for the 
> reference, later if someone is not able to access the link then they can 
> request Microchip to get the document.
> 
> What do you think about this proposal? If you agree then I will proceed 
> for preparing the next version with your comments.

Thumbs up from me
R

> > Otherwise LGTM
> > 
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Parthiban V
>