[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <521116.1685091071@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2023 09:51:11 +0100
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, oe-lkp@...ts.linux.dev, lkp@...el.com,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
ying.huang@...el.com, feng.tang@...el.com, fengwei.yin@...el.com
Subject: Re: [dhowells-fs:sendpage-1] [tcp] 77f5a42b2d: netperf.Throughput_Mbps -14.6% regression
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> wrote:
> kernel test robot noticed a -14.6% regression of netperf.Throughput_Mbps on:
Okay, yes, I see something similar on my test machine. Loopback throughput
drops from ~32Gbit/s to ~26Gbit/s with the Convert do_tcp_sendpages patch.
But! The complete set of patches is not yet fully applied. If you look at the
two patches I've put on my sendpage-1 branch[1], the first brings the
performance back to where it was before and the second bumps it up to
~43Gbit/s.
However, I don't want to push those into the network tree until support for
MSG_SPLICE_PAGES is added to all the network protocols that support splicing.
I have two more patchsets in the queue and there will be a third before I can
get to that point.
Could you try running this branch through your tests?
Thanks,
David
[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs.git/log/?h=sendpage-1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists