netdev - Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 3/8] dcb: app: modify dcb_app_table_remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87pm6j5ako.fsf@nvidia.com>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2023 19:00:14 +0200
From: Petr Machata <petrm@...dia.com>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <dsahern@...nel.org>,
	<stephen@...workplumber.org>, <petrm@...dia.com>,
	<UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2-next v2 3/8] dcb: app: modify
 dcb_app_table_remove_replaced() for dcb-rewr reuse


Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com> writes:

> When doing a replace command, entries are checked against selector and
> protocol. Rewrite requires the check to be against selector and
> priority.
>
> Adapt the existing dcb_app_table_remove_replace function for this, by
> using callback functions for selector, pid and prio checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@...rochip.com>
> ---
>  dcb/dcb.h     | 14 ++++++++++++++
>  dcb/dcb_app.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
>  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/dcb/dcb.h b/dcb/dcb.h
> index d40664f29dad..84ce95d5c1b2 100644
> --- a/dcb/dcb.h
> +++ b/dcb/dcb.h
> @@ -56,11 +56,25 @@ void dcb_print_array_kw(const __u8 *array, size_t array_size,
>  
>  /* dcb_app.c */
>  
> +struct dcb_app_table {
> +	struct dcb_app *apps;
> +	size_t n_apps;
> +	int attr;
> +};
> +
>  int dcb_cmd_app(struct dcb *dcb, int argc, char **argv);
>  enum ieee_attrs_app dcb_app_attr_type_get(__u8 selector);
>  bool dcb_app_attr_type_validate(enum ieee_attrs_app type);
>  bool dcb_app_selector_validate(enum ieee_attrs_app type, __u8 selector);
>  
> +bool dcb_app_pid_eq(const struct dcb_app *aa, const struct dcb_app *ab);
> +bool dcb_app_prio_eq(const struct dcb_app *aa, const struct dcb_app *ab);

This function isn't necessary until 5/8, that's when it should be added.

> +
> +void dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(struct dcb_app_table *a,
> +				   const struct dcb_app_table *b,
> +				   bool (*key_eq)(const struct dcb_app *aa,
> +						  const struct dcb_app *ab));
> +

This is conflating publication with prototype change. It would be best
to separate. I think the publication could be done at the point when you
actually need the function, i.e. 5/8 as well. I would keep here just the
prototype change.

>  /* dcb_apptrust.c */
>  
>  int dcb_cmd_apptrust(struct dcb *dcb, int argc, char **argv);
> diff --git a/dcb/dcb_app.c b/dcb/dcb_app.c
> index 1e36541bec61..4cd175a0623b 100644
> --- a/dcb/dcb_app.c
> +++ b/dcb/dcb_app.c
> @@ -68,12 +68,6 @@ static void dcb_app_help(void)
>  	dcb_app_help_add();
>  }
>  
> -struct dcb_app_table {
> -	struct dcb_app *apps;
> -	size_t n_apps;
> -	int attr;
> -};
> -
>  enum ieee_attrs_app dcb_app_attr_type_get(__u8 selector)
>  {
>  	switch (selector) {
> @@ -153,8 +147,22 @@ static void dcb_app_table_remove_existing(struct dcb_app_table *a,
>  	a->n_apps = ja;
>  }
>  
> -static void dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(struct dcb_app_table *a,
> -					  const struct dcb_app_table *b)
> +bool dcb_app_pid_eq(const struct dcb_app *aa, const struct dcb_app *ab)
> +{
> +	return aa->selector == ab->selector &&
> +	       aa->protocol == ab->protocol;
> +}
> +
> +bool dcb_app_prio_eq(const struct dcb_app *aa, const struct dcb_app *ab)
> +{
> +	return aa->selector == ab->selector &&
> +	       aa->priority == ab->priority;
> +}
> +
> +void dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(struct dcb_app_table *a,
> +				   const struct dcb_app_table *b,
> +				   bool (*key_eq)(const struct dcb_app *aa,
> +						  const struct dcb_app *ab))
>  {
>  	size_t ia, ja;
>  	size_t ib;
> @@ -167,13 +175,13 @@ static void dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(struct dcb_app_table *a,
>  		for (ib = 0; ib < b->n_apps; ib++) {
>  			const struct dcb_app *ab = &b->apps[ib];
>  
> -			if (aa->selector == ab->selector &&
> -			    aa->protocol == ab->protocol)
> +			if (key_eq(aa, ab))
>  				present = true;
>  			else
>  				continue;
>  
> -			if (aa->priority == ab->priority) {
> +			if (aa->protocol == ab->protocol &&
> +			    aa->priority == ab->priority) {
>  				found = true;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -891,7 +899,7 @@ static int dcb_cmd_app_replace(struct dcb *dcb, const char *dev, int argc, char
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Remove the obsolete entries. */
> -	dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(&orig, &tab);
> +	dcb_app_table_remove_replaced(&orig, &tab, dcb_app_pid_eq);
>  	ret = dcb_app_add_del(dcb, dev, DCB_CMD_IEEE_DEL, &orig, NULL);
>  	if (ret != 0) {
>  		fprintf(stderr, "Could not remove replaced APP entries\n");