[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878rd5v49t.fsf@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2023 15:33:02 -0700
From: Vinicius Costa Gomes <vinicius.gomes@...el.com>
To: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric
Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>, Cong Wang
<xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Kurt Kanzenbach
<kurt@...utronix.de>, Gerhard Engleder <gerhard@...leder-embedded.com>,
Amritha Nambiar <amritha.nambiar@...el.com>, Ferenc Fejes
<ferenc.fejes@...csson.com>, Xiaoliang Yang <xiaoliang.yang_1@....com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, Pranavi Somisetty
<pranavi.somisetty@....com>, Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@....com>,
Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>, Alexandre Torgue
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, Michael Sit Wei Hong
<michael.wei.hong.sit@...el.com>, Mohammad Athari Bin Ismail
<mohammad.athari.ismail@...el.com>, Oleksij Rempel
<linux@...pel-privat.de>, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, Florian
Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>, Claudiu Manoil <claudiu.manoil@....com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, Jesse
Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Horatiu Vultur
<horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>, Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>, Maxime
Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Muhammad
Husaini Zulkifli <muhammad.husaini.zulkifli@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] net/sched: taprio: don't overwrite "sch"
variable in taprio_dump_class_stats()
Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> writes:
> On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 02:14:17PM -0700, Vinicius Costa Gomes wrote:
>> But I have a suggestion, this "taprio_queue_get() ->
>> dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping()" dance should have the same result as
>> calling 'taprio_leaf()'.
>>
>> I am thinking of using taprio_leaf() here and in taprio_dump_class().
>> Could be a separate commit.
>
> Got it, you want to consolidate the dev_queue->qdisc_sleeping pattern.
> Since taprio_dump_class() could benefit from the consolidation too, they
> could really be both converted separately. Or I could also handle that
> in this patch set, if I need to resend it.
Exactly. Both options sound great.
Cheers,
--
Vinicius
Powered by blists - more mailing lists