[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230601110713.GE395338@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2023 14:07:13 +0300
From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Dinh Nguyen <dinguyen@...nel.org>,
Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-modules@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/13] x86/jitalloc: prepare to allocate exectuatble
memory as ROX
On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 12:30:50PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 01:12:56PM +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>
> > +static void __init_or_module do_text_poke(void *addr, const void *opcode, size_t len)
> > +{
> > + if (system_state < SYSTEM_RUNNING) {
> > + text_poke_early(addr, opcode, len);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke(addr, opcode, len);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> So I don't much like do_text_poke(); why?
I believe the idea was to keep memcpy for early boot before the kernel
image is protected without going and adding if (is_module_text_address())
all over the place.
I think this can be used instead without updating all the call sites of
text_poke_early():
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
index 91057de8e6bc..f994e63e9903 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/alternative.c
@@ -1458,7 +1458,7 @@ void __init_or_module text_poke_early(void *addr, const void *opcode,
* code cannot be running and speculative code-fetches are
* prevented. Just change the code.
*/
- memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
+ text_poke_copy(addr, opcode, len);
} else {
local_irq_save(flags);
memcpy(addr, opcode, len);
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > index aa99536b824c..d50595f2c1a6 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/ftrace.c
> > @@ -118,10 +118,13 @@ ftrace_modify_code_direct(unsigned long ip, const char *old_code,
> > return ret;
> >
> > /* replace the text with the new text */
> > - if (ftrace_poke_late)
> > + if (ftrace_poke_late) {
> > text_poke_queue((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE, NULL);
> > - else
> > - text_poke_early((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> > + } else {
> > + mutex_lock(&text_mutex);
> > + text_poke((void *)ip, new_code, MCOUNT_INSN_SIZE);
> > + mutex_unlock(&text_mutex);
> > + }
> > return 0;
> > }
>
> And in the above case it's actively wrong for loosing the _queue()
> thing.
--
Sincerely yours,
Mike.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists