netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/1] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement USXGMII mode for mv88e6393x

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZHnEzPadBBbfwj18@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 11:30:36 +0100
From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
To: msmulski2@...il.com, Ioana Ciornei <ioana.ciornei@....com>
Cc: andrew@...n.ch, f.fainelli@...il.com, olteanv@...il.com,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org,
	pabeni@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, simon.horman@...igine.com,
	kabel@...nel.org, Michal Smulski <michal.smulski@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6 1/1] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: implement USXGMII
 mode for mv88e6393x

On Thu, Jun 01, 2023 at 05:17:04PM -0700, msmulski2@...il.com wrote:
> +/* USXGMII registers for Marvell switch 88e639x are undocumented and this function is based
> + * on some educated guesses. It appears that there are no status bits related to
> + * autonegotiation complete or flow control.
> + */
> +static int mv88e639x_serdes_pcs_get_state_usxgmii(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip,
> +						  int port, int lane,
> +						  struct phylink_link_state *state)
> +{
> +	u16 status, lp_status;
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = mv88e6390_serdes_read(chip, lane, MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> +				    MV88E6390_USXGMII_PHY_STATUS, &status);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(chip->dev, "can't read Serdes USXGMII PHY status: %d\n", err);
> +		return err;
> +	}
> +	dev_dbg(chip->dev, "USXGMII PHY status: 0x%x\n", status);
> +
> +	state->link = !!(status & MDIO_USXGMII_LINK);
> +
> +	if (state->link) {
> +		err = mv88e6390_serdes_read(chip, lane, MDIO_MMD_PHYXS,
> +					    MV88E6390_USXGMII_LP_STATUS, &lp_status);

What's the difference between these two registers? Specifically, what
I'm asking is why the USXGMII partner status seems to be split between
two separate registers.

Note that I think phylink_decode_usxgmii_word() is probably missing a
check for MDIO_USXGMII_LINK, based on how Cisco SGMII works (and
USXGMII is pretty similar.)

MDIO_USXGMII_LINK indicates whether the attached PHY has link on the
media side or not. It's entirely possible for the USXGMII link to be
up (thus allowing us to receive the "LPA" from the PHY) but for the
PHY to be reporting to us that it has no media side link.

So, I think phylink_decode_usxgmii_word() at least needs at the
beginning this added:

	if (!(lpa & MDIO_USXGMII_LINK)) {
		state->link = false;
		return;
	}

The only user of this has been the Lynx PCS, so I'll add Ioana to this
email as well to see whether there's any objection from Lynx PCS users
to adding it.

-- 
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 80Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!