[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 08:59:21 +0000
From: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
CC: "s.shtylyov@....ru" <s.shtylyov@....ru>, "davem@...emloft.net"
<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "geert+renesas@...der.be"
<geert+renesas@...der.be>, "magnus.damm@...il.com" <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next 5/5] net: renesas: rswitch: Use per-queue rate
limiter
Hi Simon-san,
> From: Simon Horman, Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2023 4:29 AM
>
> On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 05:08:40PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Use per-queue rate limiter instead of global rate limiter. Otherwise
> > TX performance will be low when we use multiple ports at the same time.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++---------
> > drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.h | 15 +++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c
> > index 4ae34b0206cd..a7195625a2c7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/renesas/rswitch.c
> > @@ -156,22 +156,31 @@ static int rswitch_gwca_axi_ram_reset(struct rswitch_private *priv)
> > return rswitch_reg_wait(priv->addr, GWARIRM, GWARIRM_ARR, GWARIRM_ARR);
> > }
> >
> > -static void rswitch_gwca_set_rate_limit(struct rswitch_private *priv, int rate)
> > +static void rswitch_gwca_set_rate_limit(struct rswitch_private *priv,
> > + struct rswitch_gwca_queue *txq)
> > {
> > - u32 gwgrlulc, gwgrlc;
> > + u64 period_ps;
> > + unsigned long rate;
> > + u32 gwrlc;
>
> Hi Shimoda-san,
>
> a minor not from my side: please use reverse xmas tree order - longest line
> to shortest - for local variable declarations in networking code.
>
> unsigned long rate;
> u64 period_ps;
> u32 gwrlc;
Thank you for your comment! I completely forgot that network driver should use
reverse xmas tree order...
JFYI, I found another way to improve the performance. So, I dropped this patch on v2 [1].
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230606085558.1708766-1-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com/
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> --
> pw-bot: cr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists