lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:50:58 -0400
From: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>, Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>, 
	linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>, 
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, 
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, 
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] ieee802154: ca8210: Remove stray
 gpiod_unexport() call

Hi Miquel,

On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 5:47 AM Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
>
>
> aahringo@...hat.com wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:33:47 -0400:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:12 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:42:20AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 05:09:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > There is no gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() looks pretty much stray.
> > > > > The gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() shouldn't be used in the code,
> > > > > GPIO sysfs is deprecated. That said, simply drop the stray call.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > Can this be applied now?
> >
> > ping, Miquel? :)
>
> I already applied it locally, but I am trying to fix my "thanks for
> patch" routine to not tell you it was applied on the mtd tree :-p

okay no problem. Fully understandable as we have a new workflow
mechanism for 802.15.4.

Thanks. :)

- Alex


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ