[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2023 16:03:19 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Alexander Aring <aahringo@...hat.com>,
Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>,
Stefan Schmidt <stefan@...enfreihafen.org>,
linux-wpan@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Aring <alex.aring@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v1 1/1] ieee802154: ca8210: Remove stray
gpiod_unexport() call
On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 11:47:43AM +0200, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> aahringo@...hat.com wrote on Tue, 6 Jun 2023 05:33:47 -0400:
> > On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 10:12 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:42:20AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > > On Sun, May 28, 2023 at 05:09:38PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > > > There is no gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() looks pretty much stray.
> > > > > The gpiod_export() and gpiod_unexport() shouldn't be used in the code,
> > > > > GPIO sysfs is deprecated. That said, simply drop the stray call.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > > Can this be applied now?
> >
> > ping, Miquel? :)
>
> I already applied it locally, but I am trying to fix my "thanks for
> patch" routine to not tell you it was applied on the mtd tree :-p
Good to know and thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists