[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230607094228.10f5b84a@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2023 09:42:28 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...igine.com>
Cc: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@...el.com>, Alexander Lobakin
<aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, Jesse
Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Anirudh Venkataramanan
<anirudh.venkataramanan@...el.com>, Sudheer Mogilappagari
<sudheer.mogilappagari@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iwl-next] ice: clean up __ice_aq_get_set_rss_lut()
On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 09:34:42 +0200 Simon Horman wrote:
> > it's the same on gcc-13 on default (make M=...) settings, I think, I will
> > post next version that is passing that build, even if to make integration
> > with new gcc easier
>
> Thanks. TBH it does seem a bit silly to me.
> But GCC builds failing does seem to be a problem that warrants being addressed.
Isn't GCC right? There's no guarantee that the value of @type in real,
numerical sense falls within the set of values sanctioned by the enum.
It is C after all, so enums are just decorated ints, aren't they?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists