netdev - Re: [PATCH ethtool-next] sff-8636: report LOL / LOS / Tx Fault

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230609093607.72a8e3f2@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2023 09:36:07 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, mkubecek@...e.cz, danieller@...dia.com,
 idosch@...dia.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, vladyslavt@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH ethtool-next] sff-8636: report LOL / LOS / Tx Fault

On Fri, 9 Jun 2023 17:18:27 +0100 Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> My mental stumbling block is that quad interfaces seem to act as either
> four separate network interfaces, or I think the lanes can be combined
> to double or quadruple the data bandwidth. How this looks from the
> firmware description perspective (in either DT or elsewhere) I don't
> know. Can they be dynamically changed too?

Last question I think I can answer at least from the uAPI perspective -
yes, via the devlink port split API. There's also an ethtool API for
configuring how many lanes are used within a single MAC (e.g. 2x25G vs
1x50G).