netdev - Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Boot stall from merge tag 'net-next-6.2'

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZIcmpcEsTLXFaO0f@debian.me>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 21:07:33 +0700
From: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
To: Sami Korkalainen <sami.korkalainen@...ton.me>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
	Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Boot stall from merge tag 'net-next-6.2'

On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 04:07:56AM +0000, Sami Korkalainen wrote:
> >Where is SCSI info?
> 
> Right there, under the text (It was so short, that I thought to put it in the message. Maybe I should have put that also in pastebin for consistency and clarity):
> 
> Attached devices:
> Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: ATA      Model: KINGSTON SVP200S Rev: C4
> Type:   Direct-Access                    ANSI  SCSI revision: 05
> Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> Vendor: hp       Model: CDDVDW TS-L633M  Rev: 0301
> Type:   CD-ROM                           ANSI  SCSI revision: 05
> 
> >I think networking changes shouldn't cause this ACPI regression, right?
> Yeah, beats me, but that's what I got by bisecting. My expertise ends about here.

Hmm, no reply for a while.

Networking people: It looks like your v6.2 PR introduces unrelated
ACPICA regression. Can you explain why?

ACPICA people: Can you figure out why do this regression happen?

Sami: Can you try latest mainline and repeat bisection as confirmation?

I'm considering to remove this from regression tracking if there is
no replies in several more days.

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)