[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <oEbkgJ-ImLxBDZDUTnIAGFWrRVnwBss3FOlalTpwrz83xWgESC9pcvNKiAVp9BzFgqZ0V-NIwzBZ7icKD8ynuIi_ZMtGt7URu3ftcSt16u4=@proton.me>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2023 19:05:45 +0000
From: Sami Korkalainen <sami.korkalainen@...ton.me>
To: Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Regressions <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>, Linux Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, "Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@...mhuis.info>
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION][BISECTED] Boot stall from merge tag 'net-next-6.2'
Ok. I will try the latest mainline and if it does not work, I try bisecting again, but it should take at least a couple of weeks with this old PC. Can't really compile more than once a day.
Regards
Sami Korkalainen
___________________________
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
------- Original Message -------
On Monday, June 12th, 2023 at 17.07, Bagas Sanjaya <bagasdotme@...il.com> wrote:
> On Sat, May 27, 2023 at 04:07:56AM +0000, Sami Korkalainen wrote:
>
> > > Where is SCSI info?
> >
> > Right there, under the text (It was so short, that I thought to put it in the message. Maybe I should have put that also in pastebin for consistency and clarity):
> >
> > Attached devices:
> > Host: scsi0 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: ATA Model: KINGSTON SVP200S Rev: C4
> > Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05
> > Host: scsi1 Channel: 00 Id: 00 Lun: 00
> > Vendor: hp Model: CDDVDW TS-L633M Rev: 0301
> > Type: CD-ROM ANSI SCSI revision: 05
> >
> > > I think networking changes shouldn't cause this ACPI regression, right?
> > > Yeah, beats me, but that's what I got by bisecting. My expertise ends about here.
>
>
> Hmm, no reply for a while.
>
> Networking people: It looks like your v6.2 PR introduces unrelated
> ACPICA regression. Can you explain why?
>
> ACPICA people: Can you figure out why do this regression happen?
>
> Sami: Can you try latest mainline and repeat bisection as confirmation?
>
> I'm considering to remove this from regression tracking if there is
> no replies in several more days.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara
Powered by blists - more mailing lists