netdev - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the rdma-fixes tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230613123932.GA12152@unreal>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:39:32 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
	Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Daniel Jurgens <danielj@...dia.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mark Bloch <mbloch@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the
 rdma-fixes tree

On Tue, Jun 13, 2023 at 11:43:59AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   617f5db1a626 ("RDMA/mlx5: Fix affinity assignment")
> 
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   dc13180824b7 ("net/mlx5: Enable devlink port for embedded cpu VF vports")
> 
> from the net-next tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> index e0156b54d0b3,18a608a1f567..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/driver.h
> @@@ -1228,18 -1246,11 +1236,23 @@@ static inline u16 mlx5_core_max_vfs(con
>   	return dev->priv.sriov.max_vfs;
>   }
>   
>  +static inline int mlx5_lag_is_lacp_owner(struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
>  +{
>  +	/* LACP owner conditions:
>  +	 * 1) Function is physical.
>  +	 * 2) LAG is supported by FW.
>  +	 * 3) LAG is managed by driver (currently the only option).
>  +	 */
>  +	return  MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, vport_group_manager) &&
>  +		   (MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, num_lag_ports) > 1) &&
>  +		    MLX5_CAP_GEN(dev, lag_master);
>  +}
>  +
> + static inline u16 mlx5_core_max_ec_vfs(const struct mlx5_core_dev *dev)
> + {
> + 	return dev->priv.sriov.max_ec_vfs;
> + }
> + 

Thanks for the resolution. Looks good.

>   static inline int mlx5_get_gid_table_len(u16 param)
>   {
>   	if (param > 4) {