[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIho89roQv3NsQ47@strlen.de>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2023 15:02:43 +0200
From: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To: Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com>
Cc: Vlad Buslov <vladbu@...dia.com>, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Oz Shlomo <ozsh@...dia.com>,
Roi Dayan <roid@...dia.com>, Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Jozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@...filter.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@...atatu.com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/1] net/sched: act_ct: Fix promotion of offloaded
unreplied tuple
Paul Blakey <paulb@...dia.com> wrote:
> Currently UNREPLIED and UNASSURED connections are added to the nf flow
> table. This causes the following connection packets to be processed
> by the flow table which then skips conntrack_in(), and thus such the
> connections will remain UNREPLIED and UNASSURED even if reply traffic
> is then seen. Even still, the unoffloaded reply packets are the ones
> triggering hardware update from new to established state, and if
> there aren't any to triger an update and/or previous update was
> missed, hardware can get out of sync with sw and still mark
> packets as new.
Reviewed-by: Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists