lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875y7qcbxo.fsf@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2023 18:15:31 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org>
To: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
Cc: linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org,  linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,  linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,  "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,  Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,  Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,  Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,  netdev@...r.kernel.org,  Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] wifi: cfg80211: replace strlcpy() with strscpy()

Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com> writes:

> On Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 10:24 AM Kalle Valo <kvalo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com> writes:
>>
>> > strlcpy() reads the entire source buffer first.
>> > This read may exceed the destination size limit.
>> > This is both inefficient and can lead to linear read
>> > overflows if a source string is not NUL-terminated [1].
>> > In an effort to remove strlcpy() completely [2], replace
>> > strlcpy() here with strscpy().
>> >
>> > Direct replacement is safe here since WIPHY_ASSIGN is only used by
>> > TRACE macros and the return values are ignored.
>> >
>> > [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strlcpy
>> > [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/89
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Azeem Shaikh <azeemshaikh38@...il.com>
>> > ---
>> > v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230612232301.2572316-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com/
>> > v2: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230614134552.2108471-1-azeemshaikh38@gmail.com/
>>
>> In the change log (after the "---" line) you should also describe what
>> changes you made, more info in the wiki below. In this case it's clear
>> as the patch is simple but please keep this in mind for future patches.
>>
>> No need to resend because of this.
>>
>
> Thanks Kalle. I did have the below line in my changelog. For future
> patches, do you mean that changelog descriptions need to be more
> specific than this? For example - updated title from "x" -> "y"?
>
>> Changes from v1 and v2 - updated patch title.

Ah, I missed that because the format was not what we usually use. I
recommend something like this:

v3:

* add bar

v2:

* https://
* fix foo

v1:

* https://

-- 
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/

https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ