[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZIrgEVVQfvJwneLx@boxer>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 11:55:29 +0200
From: Maciej Fijalkowski <maciej.fijalkowski@...el.com>
To: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, Tony Nguyen
<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, "Andre
Guedes" <andre.guedes@...el.com>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...aro.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, "David S. Miller"
<davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Florian Kauer
<florian.kauer@...utronix.de>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, "Jesper
Dangaard Brouer" <hawk@...nel.org>, Jithu Joseph <jithu.joseph@...el.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Vedang Patel <vedang.patel@...el.com>, <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net] igc: Avoid dereference of ptr_err in
igc_clean_rx_irq()
On Thu, Jun 15, 2023 at 11:45:36AM +0200, Simon Horman wrote:
Hi Simon,
> In igc_clean_rx_irq() the result of a call to igc_xdp_run_prog() is assigned
> to the skb local variable. This may be an ERR_PTR.
>
> A little later the following is executed, which seems to be a
> possible dereference of an ERR_PTR.
>
> total_bytes += skb->len;
>
> Avoid this problem by continuing the loop in which all of the
> above occurs once the handling of the NULL case completes.
>
> This proposed fix is speculative - I do not have deep knowledge of this
> driver. And I am concerned about the effect of skipping the following
> logic:
>
> igc_put_rx_buffer(rx_ring, rx_buffer, rx_buffer_pgcnt);
> cleaned_count++;
this will break - you have to recycle the buffer to have it going.
>
> Flagged by Smatch as:
>
> .../igc_main.c:2467 igc_xdp_run_prog() warn: passing zero to 'ERR_PTR'
how about PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() ? this would silence smatch and is not an
intrusive change. another way is to get rid of ERR_PTR() around skb/xdp
run result but i think the former would be just fine.
>
> Compile tested only.
>
> Fixes: 26575105d6ed ("igc: Add initial XDP support")
> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> index 88145c30c919..b58c8a674bd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_main.c
> @@ -2586,6 +2586,7 @@ static int igc_clean_rx_irq(struct igc_q_vector *q_vector, const int budget)
>
> total_packets++;
> total_bytes += size;
> + continue;
> } else if (skb)
> igc_add_rx_frag(rx_ring, rx_buffer, skb, size);
> else if (ring_uses_build_skb(rx_ring))
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists