netdev - RE: [RFC PATCH v8 01/10] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <DM6PR11MB465768D2B3C4F1E6F2DD1B219B5BA@DM6PR11MB4657.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2023 13:44:31 +0000
From: "Kubalewski, Arkadiusz" <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC: "vadfed@...a.com" <vadfed@...a.com>, "jonathan.lemon@...il.com"
	<jonathan.lemon@...il.com>, "pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	"vadfed@...com" <vadfed@...com>, "Brandeburg, Jesse"
	<jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>, "Nguyen, Anthony L"
	<anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com>, "M, Saeed" <saeedm@...dia.com>,
	"leon@...nel.org" <leon@...nel.org>, "richardcochran@...il.com"
	<richardcochran@...il.com>, "sj@...nel.org" <sj@...nel.org>,
	"javierm@...hat.com" <javierm@...hat.com>, "ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com"
	<ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com>, "mst@...hat.com" <mst@...hat.com>,
	"tzimmermann@...e.de" <tzimmermann@...e.de>, "Michalik, Michal"
	<michal.michalik@...el.com>, "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org"
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, "jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com"
	<jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com>, "airlied@...hat.com"
	<airlied@...hat.com>, "ogabbay@...nel.org" <ogabbay@...nel.org>,
	"arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>, "nipun.gupta@....com" <nipun.gupta@....com>,
	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>, "linux@...y.sk" <linux@...y.sk>,
	"masahiroy@...nel.org" <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
	"benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com" <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
	"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>, "Olech, Milena"
	<milena.olech@...el.com>, "kuniyu@...zon.com" <kuniyu@...zon.com>,
	"liuhangbin@...il.com" <liuhangbin@...il.com>, "hkallweit1@...il.com"
	<hkallweit1@...il.com>, "andy.ren@...cruise.com" <andy.ren@...cruise.com>,
	"razor@...ckwall.org" <razor@...ckwall.org>, "idosch@...dia.com"
	<idosch@...dia.com>, "lucien.xin@...il.com" <lucien.xin@...il.com>,
	"nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com" <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>, "phil@....cc"
	<phil@....cc>, "claudiajkang@...il.com" <claudiajkang@...il.com>,
	"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, poros <poros@...hat.com>, mschmidt
	<mschmidt@...hat.com>, "linux-clk@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, "vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev"
	<vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH v8 01/10] dpll: documentation on DPLL subsystem
 interface

>From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
>Sent: Thursday, June 15, 2023 12:18 PM
>
>Wed, Jun 14, 2023 at 09:23:48PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>>On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:15:14 -0700 Jakub Kicinski wrote:
>>> On Wed, 14 Jun 2023 12:21:29 +0000 Kubalewski, Arkadiusz wrote:
>>> > Surely, we can skip this discussion and split the nest attr into
>something like:
>>> > - PIN_A_PIN_PARENT_DEVICE,
>>> > - PIN_A_PIN_PARENT_PIN.
>>>
>>> Yup, exactly. Should a fairly change code wise, if I'm looking right.
>>                               ^ small
>
>Yeah, that is what we had originally. This just pushes out the
>different attr selection from the nest one level up to the actualy
>nesting attribute.
>
>One downside of this is you will have 2 arrays of parent objects,
>one per parent type. Current code neatly groups them into a single array.
>
>I guess this is a matter of personal preference, I'm fine either way.

Ok, I will split it.

Thank you!
Arkadiusz