netdev - Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6f9e9c385096bd965e53c49065848953398f5b8e.camel@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 16:00:19 +0000
From: "Edgecombe, Rick P" <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"rppt@...nel.org" <rppt@...nel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>, "mcgrof@...nel.org"
	<mcgrof@...nel.org>, "deller@....de" <deller@....de>, "davem@...emloft.net"
	<davem@...emloft.net>, "nadav.amit@...il.com" <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
	"linux@...linux.org.uk" <linux@...linux.org.uk>, "netdev@...r.kernel.org"
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, "hca@...ux.ibm.com" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
	"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	"kent.overstreet@...ux.dev" <kent.overstreet@...ux.dev>,
	"puranjay12@...il.com" <puranjay12@...il.com>, "linux-s390@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>, "palmer@...belt.com" <palmer@...belt.com>,
	"chenhuacai@...nel.org" <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, "tsbogend@...ha.franken.de"
	<tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>, "linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>, "christophe.leroy@...roup.eu"
	<christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
	"mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>, "mark.rutland@....com"
	<mark.rutland@....com>, "rostedt@...dmis.org" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "dinguyen@...nel.org"
	<dinguyen@...nel.org>, "naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com"
	<naveen.n.rao@...ux.ibm.com>, "sparclinux@...r.kernel.org"
	<sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-modules@...r.kernel.org"
	<linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>, "bpf@...r.kernel.org" <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, "song@...nel.org" <song@...nel.org>,
	"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "loongarch@...ts.linux.dev"
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org"
	<akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/12] nios2: define virtual address space for modules

On Fri, 2023-06-16 at 11:50 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
>  void *module_alloc(unsigned long size)
>  {
> -       if (size == 0)
> -               return NULL;
> -       return kmalloc(size, GFP_KERNEL);
> -}
> -
> -/* Free memory returned from module_alloc */
> -void module_memfree(void *module_region)
> -{
> -       kfree(module_region);
> +       return __vmalloc_node_range(size, 1, MODULES_VADDR,
> MODULES_END,
> +                                   GFP_KERNEL, PAGE_KERNEL_EXEC,
> +                                   VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS,
> NUMA_NO_NODE,
> +                                   __builtin_return_address(0));
>  }
>  
>  int apply_relocate_add(Elf32_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *s

I wonder if the (size == 0) check is really needed, but
__vmalloc_node_range() will WARN on this case where the old code won't.