netdev - Re: [PATCH net v1] Revert "net: phy: dp83867: perform soft reset and retain established link"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5563611e-5354-42fc-b33f-b1b4945e71de@lunn.ch>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 18:30:28 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Francesco Dolcini <francesco@...cini.it>
Cc: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>,
	Geet Modi <geet.modi@...com>, Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1] Revert "net: phy: dp83867: perform soft reset and
 retain established link"

On Mon, Jun 19, 2023 at 05:44:35PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote:
> From: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>
> 
> This reverts commit da9ef50f545f86ffe6ff786174d26500c4db737a.
> 
> This fixes a regression in which the link would come up, but no
> communication was possible.
> 
> The reverted commit was also removing a comment about
> DP83867_PHYCR_FORCE_LINK_GOOD, this is not added back in this commits
> since it seems that this is unrelated to the original code change.
> 
> Cc: Praneeth Bajjuri <praneeth@...com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZGuDJos8D7N0J6Z2@francesco-nb.int.toradex.com/
> Fixes: da9ef50f545f ("net: phy: dp83867: perform soft reset and retain established link")
> Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@...adex.com>

There has been plenty of time given for somebody to investigate this
regression, and nothing has happened. So i agree, lets revert it.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>

    Andrew