[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230620141212.2469148-1-niravkumar.l.rabara@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2023 22:12:12 +0800
From: niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com
To: krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org
Cc: adrian.ho.yin.ng@...el.com,
andrew@...n.ch,
conor+dt@...nel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
dinguyen@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org,
niravkumar.l.rabara@...el.com,
p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
richardcochran@...il.com,
robh+dt@...nel.org,
sboyd@...nel.org,
wen.ping.teh@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: intel: Add Intel Agilex5 compatible
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>> index 4b4dcf551eb6..28849c720314 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/intel,socfpga.yaml
>> @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ properties:
>> - intel,n5x-socdk
>> - intel,socfpga-agilex-n6000
>> - intel,socfpga-agilex-socdk
>> + - intel,socfpga-agilex5-socdk
>> - const: intel,socfpga-agilex
>
>This is agilex5, not agilex. Why are you using the same SoC compatible?
>You have entire commit msg to explain your hardware and avoid such questions...
Yes, better to use different SoC compatible for Agilex5,
will add new description and item for Agilex5 board in v2 patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists