netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>
Cc: kuba@...nel.org, vadfed@...a.com, jonathan.lemon@...il.com,
	pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net, davem@...emloft.net,
	edumazet@...gle.com, vadfed@...com, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
	anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org,
	richardcochran@...il.com, sj@...nel.org, javierm@...hat.com,
	ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, mst@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de,
	michal.michalik@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...hat.com,
	ogabbay@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, nipun.gupta@....com,
	axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk, masahiroy@...nel.org,
	benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com, geert+renesas@...der.be,
	milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com, liuhangbin@...il.com,
	hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com, razor@...ckwall.org,
	idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
	phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, poros@...hat.com,
	mschmidt@...hat.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 02:38:10PM CEST, arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com wrote:
>Implement common API for clock/DPLL configuration and status reporting.
>The API utilises netlink interface as transport for commands and event
>notifications. This API aim to extend current pin configuration and
>make it flexible and easy to cover special configurations.
>
>Netlink interface is based on ynl spec, it allows use of in-kernel
>tools/net/ynl/cli.py application to control the interface with properly
>formated command and json attribute strings. Here are few command
>examples of how it works with `ice` driver on supported NIC:

I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going
on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example:
1) mode_set op removal
2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok -
				that's the unfinished discussion)
3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds
   reasonable, yet nothing changed

I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and
over?