[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5c6dc00b-9e25-501f-1497-ce7f67694a0e@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2023 08:20:25 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>
To: Stefan Metzmacher <metze@...ba.org>, Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
axboe@...nel.dk, asml.silence@...il.com
Cc: io-uring@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com,
kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
Matthieu Baerts <matthieu.baerts@...sares.net>,
Mat Martineau <martineau@...nel.org>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>, leit@...com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dccp@...r.kernel.org, mptcp@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, ast@...nel.org, kuniyu@...zon.com,
martin.lau@...nel.org, Jason Xing <kernelxing@...cent.com>,
Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>, Willem de Bruijn
<willemb@...gle.com>, Guillaume Nault <gnault@...hat.com>,
Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] net: wire up support for
file_operations->uring_cmd()
On 6/23/23 3:17 AM, Stefan Metzmacher wrote:
>
> I'd like to keep it passed to socket layer, so that sockets could
> implement some extra features in an async fashion.
>
> What about having the function you posted below (and in v3)
> as a default implementation if proto_ops->uring_cmd is NULL?
>
Nothing about this set needs uring_cmd added to proto ops. It adds uring
commands which are wrappers to networking APIs. Let's keep proper APIs
between subsystems.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists