lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230624144309.71aa507d@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 14:43:09 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, vadfed@...a.com,
 jonathan.lemon@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
 davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, vadfed@...com,
 jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com, saeedm@...dia.com,
 leon@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com, sj@...nel.org,
 javierm@...hat.com, ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com, mst@...hat.com,
 tzimmermann@...e.de, michal.michalik@...el.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
 jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com, airlied@...hat.com, ogabbay@...nel.org,
 arnd@...db.de, nipun.gupta@....com, axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk,
 masahiroy@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
 geert+renesas@...der.be, milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
 liuhangbin@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com,
 razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
 nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
 linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
 poros@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

On Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:23:36 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Well I would like to conclude discussion in one thread before sending
> the next one. What should I do? Should I start the same discussion
> pointing out the same issues in this thread again? This can't work.
> 
> Even concluded items are ignored, like 3)
> 
> IDK, this is very frustrating for me. I have to double check everything
> just in case it was not ignored. I don't understand this, there is no
> justification.

Yes, the open items need to be clearly stated on a new posting.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ