netdev - Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZJa2GEr6frhHQrS0@nanopsycho>
Date: Sat, 24 Jun 2023 11:23:36 +0200
From: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc: Arkadiusz Kubalewski <arkadiusz.kubalewski@...el.com>, vadfed@...a.com,
	jonathan.lemon@...il.com, pabeni@...hat.com, corbet@....net,
	davem@...emloft.net, edumazet@...gle.com, vadfed@...com,
	jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, anthony.l.nguyen@...el.com,
	saeedm@...dia.com, leon@...nel.org, richardcochran@...il.com,
	sj@...nel.org, javierm@...hat.com, ricardo.canuelo@...labora.com,
	mst@...hat.com, tzimmermann@...e.de, michal.michalik@...el.com,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jacek.lawrynowicz@...ux.intel.com,
	airlied@...hat.com, ogabbay@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	nipun.gupta@....com, axboe@...nel.dk, linux@...y.sk,
	masahiroy@...nel.org, benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com,
	geert+renesas@...der.be, milena.olech@...el.com, kuniyu@...zon.com,
	liuhangbin@...il.com, hkallweit1@...il.com, andy.ren@...cruise.com,
	razor@...ckwall.org, idosch@...dia.com, lucien.xin@...il.com,
	nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, phil@....cc, claudiajkang@...il.com,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
	linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	poros@...hat.com, mschmidt@...hat.com, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
	vadim.fedorenko@...ux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v9 00/10] Create common DPLL configuration API

Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 05:53:36PM CEST, kuba@...nel.org wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Jun 2023 17:19:11 +0200 Jiri Pirko wrote:
>> I don't understand. The discussion in the RFCv8 thread is still going
>> on. The things I mentioned there are ignored. Like for example:
>> 1) mode_set op removal
>> 2) odd ice dpll locking scheme (either fix or describe why it is ok -
>> 				that's the unfinished discussion)
>> 3) header file bits squash I suggested. Vadim wrote that it sounds
>>    reasonable, yet nothing changed
>> 
>> I thought we are past this. Why I have to point the same issues over and
>> over?
>
>FWIW I'm lost in the previous thread, so for me there's value in
>refreshing the series.
>
>But you're right, at the very least there should be a summary of
>outstanding issues / open items / ongoing discussions in the cover
>letter.

Well I would like to conclude discussion in one thread before sending
the next one. What should I do? Should I start the same discussion
pointing out the same issues in this thread again? This can't work.

Even concluded items are ignored, like 3)

IDK, this is very frustrating for me. I have to double check everything
just in case it was not ignored. I don't understand this, there is no
justification.