netdev - Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] treewide: Remove I/O port accessors for HAS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <de4fe7d1-a0ae-40eb-a9d4-434802083e70@app.fastmail.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2023 14:53:59 +0200
From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@...db.de>
To: "Niklas Schnelle" <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
 "Richard Cochran" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
 "Heiko Carstens" <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
 "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
 "Mauro Carvalho Chehab" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
 "Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
 "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
 "Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
 "Paul Walmsley" <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
 "Palmer Dabbelt" <palmer@...belt.com>, "Albert Ou" <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
 linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/44] treewide: Remove I/O port accessors for HAS_IOPORT=n

On Tue, Jun 27, 2023, at 11:12, Niklas Schnelle wrote:
> On Mon, 2023-05-22 at 13:29 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe let's give it another week to have more maintainers pick
>> up stuff from v5, and then send out a v6 as separate submissions.
>> 
>>     Arnd
>
> Hi Arnd and All,
>
> I'm sorry there hasn't been an updated in a long time and we're missing
> v6.5. I've been quite busy with other work and life. Speaking of, I
> will be mostly out for around a month starting some time mid to end
> July as, if all goes well, I'm expecting to become a dad. That said, I
> haven't forgotten about this and your overall plan of sending per-
> subsystem patches sounds good, just haven't had the time to also
> incorporate the feedback.

Ok, thanks for letting us know. I just checked to see that about half
of your series has already made it into linux-next and is likely to
be part of v6.5 or already in v6.4.

Maybe you can start out by taking a pass at just resending the ones
that don't need any changes and can just get picked up after -rc1,
and then I'll try to have a look at whatever remains after that.

    Arnd